Italian wine industry braces for Brunello consortium election

In what is perhaps the most closely watched and most talked-about election in the history of the Italian wine industry, the town of Montalcino and Italian wine industry observers across the peninsula are bracing for the May 18 election of new members and president of the administration of the Brunello producers association (Consorzio del Vino Brunello di Montalcino).

Tensions on the ground are high: in the wake of the recent Brunello controversy (which emerged after producers were accused of adding unauthorized grapes to their wines), authorities recently released the names of 6 persons who have been indicted for “adulterating” their wines, selling fraudulent products, and lying to government officials (11 other individuals accepted plea bargains, according to reports, thus avoiding trial and public scrutiny). The current director of the producers association is among those indicted by authorities and the previous president was forced to resign after he was implicated (although later exonerated) in the inquiry.

In a page seemingly torn from a Verga novella, matters have been aggravated there last week by the circulation of an anonymous and heinous letter defaming some of the more notable candidates.

Yesterday, relative newcomer to Montalcino, Angelo Gaja (more famous for his Piedmont properties and his controversial approach to the vinification of Langa wines), released a statement in which he addressed members of the producers association, informing them that the promotion of tourism and its infrastructure in Montalcino should be their primary concern. He also endorsed the candidacy of veteran producer Donatelli Cinelli Colombini, a producers with a wealth of experience in promoting tourism, he wrote, the only woman in a “council formed solely by men.”

Following publication of the document in the Gambero Rosso forum, the Italian wine blogosphere exploded with reactions, for the most part disparaging Gaja’s omission of issues of transparency and regulation.

A number of high-profile observers of the Italian wine industry have posted strong reactions to events on the ground and to Gaja’s open letter: VinoWire editor and author of the influential blog Vino al Vino Franco Ziliani marveled that Gaja did not address his previously published statements in which he proposed reforms of appellation regulations and a new more flexible DOC;  southern Italy’s leading wine blogger, Luciano Pignataro proposed 10 challenging “questions for the new president of the consortium”; and Antonio Tomacelli, editor of the widely popular blog Intravino, wrote “There’s no question that tourists play their part, for goodness’s sake, but they come to shake hands with Brunello producers — a difficult operation, especially when they’re wearing handcuffs.”

Opinion: Italy’s defunct appellation system

VinoWire editor Jeremy Parzen resides in Austin, Texas, where he is currently teaching a 6-part seminar on Italian wine at The Austin Wine Merchant.

A number of folks have posted recently about the Italian appellation system, bemoaning the fact that there is no “official” comprehensive list of DOCs and DOCGs. Back in NYC, my friend and colleague James Taylor posted at the VinoNYC blog: “as is the case with most things governmental in Italy, the system for classifying its wines can be apparently simple but deceptively complex, and can oftentimes cause a headache.” (In case you are not familiar with the Italian appellation system, see the note following this post below.)

Out here in Texas, Italian Wine Guy recently updated his list of DOCGs. His is the most comprehensive list that I know of. (Considering how much Italian wine he “touches,” as he likes to put it, as the Italian wine director for behemoth distributor Glazer’s, you’d think the Italian government would give this dude a medal. He certainly deserves one.)

It’s remarkable to think that neither the Italian government nor its Trade Commission, nor the Agriculture Ministry, nor the Italian Wine Union publish an online, comprehensive, definitive, exhaustive, up-to-date list.

But does a list really matter? Especially now?

IWG notes that while some might wonder why such a list is really necessary, it is important “because sommeliers studying for their tests want and need this information [and] anyway, it is kind of fun trying to figure a way through the labyrinth of Italian wines on that (or any) level.”

The point about sommeliers studying for their exams is a valid one: as Franco and I reported the other day, none of the three finalists in the recent AIS sommelier competition recognized a Langhe Bianco DOC (and one of its producers is no less than the Bishop of Barbaresco, Angelo Gaja!). Needless to say, the award was conferred to one of the contestants despite this glaring lacuna. The fact of the matter is that in the U.S. we perceive these regulations in an entirely different perspective — one that reveals our pseudo-Protestant and quasi-Progressivist tendencies and predilections for precision and accuracy.

One of our (American) misconceptions about the Italian appellation system is that it was designed to protect the consumer. In fact, as Teobaldo Cappellano pointed out in last year’s Brunello Debate, the DOC/DOCG system was created to protect “the territory,” i.e., the production zone and the people who live there and make wine.

On August 1, 2009, the DOC and DOCG system was essentially put to rest by newly implemented EU Common Market Organization reforms. August 1 was the deadline for the creation of wine appellations by EU member states and from that day forward, the power to create appellations passed from member states to the EU. The deadline created a mad rush to create new DOCs and DOCGs in Italy. Beginning with the current vintage, all wines produced in the EU will be labeled as Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and Protected Geographical Indication (PGI). The new designations will recognize and allow labeling using the members states’s current appellation classifications. But from now on, no new DOCs or DOCGs will be permitted.

So, I ask, does it really matter? If a tree falls in the forest and only a mime is there to see it, does anyone really care?

—Jeremy Parzen

Tuscan native Luca Martini is Italy’s “best sommelier”

luca_martini

Tuscan native Luca Martini (above) was named Italy’s “best sommelier” at the 43rd annual AIS (Associazione Italiana Sommelier or Italian Sommelier Association) conference over the weekend in Matera, Basilicata. By all accounts, camaraderie and healthy sportsmanship were bywords of the competition. Martini is the wine director at Osteria da Giovanna in Arezzo, his hometown.

carta

One surprise came in the final round, when none of the three finalists recognized a Langhe Bianco DOC produced by Angelo Gaja, Sauvignon Alteni di Brassica. The wines was included in a wine list to be corrected by competitors (above). Try your own hand at correcting the list: see the list here at the AIS blog.