Controversy in Montalcino Continues: Consortium issues statement denying “rumors” through unaffiliated website

The website published the following statement yesterday, attributed to the website of the Consorzio del Vino Brunello di Montalcino (translation by VinoWire). The editors of VinoWire have not been able to find the statement on the Consortium’s website. The editorial offices of are located in Montalcino and its contributors frequently report coverage of Consortium events and press releases.

    In reference to recent website postings on alleged violations of regulations for the production of Brunello di Montalcino, the Oversight Consortium issues the following statements:

    1) In regard to “rumors” that Montalcino producers have used southern Italian wines in their 2003 Brunello: we find it hard to believe that such a grave accusation is true and the Consortium has found no evidence whatsoever to support these claims.

    2) In regard to the purity of Brunello vineyards, in 2007, the Consortium completed inspections of more than 1,667 hectares of registered vines [according to the statement, there are 2,000 registered hectares in the appellation – editor’s note]. These inspections, which began in 2004, have revealed only 17 hectares in non-compliance, 1% of the vineyards inspected. Therefore, we can confirm that at the end of 2007, more than 99% of vineyards registered in the Brunello di Montalcino appellation were in absolute compliance with production regulations.

    The declared mandate of the administration of the Consorzio del Brunello di Montalcino is the oversight of the wines of the four appellations of Montalcino. The Consortium has always carried out this task using monitoring tools required by law as well as more rigorous tools prescribed by the Consortium’s internal norms.

    Source: Consorzio del [sic] Brunello di Montalcino [the consortium’s official title is Consorzio del Vino Brunello di Montalcino – editor’s note].


3 thoughts on “Controversy in Montalcino Continues: Consortium issues statement denying “rumors” through unaffiliated website

  1. Pingback: “Che Bella, Italia” « spume

  2. The above only proves what most in the wine industry have always suspected: That the formerly inconsistent performances of the Montalcino producers in the last ten years was eradicated by blending in varietals other than Sangiovese Grosso and Piccolo.

    The sad fact now remains that the winemaking, especially at renowned houses such as Biondi Santi, were it to be considered on merit alone-yearly basis-would tend to lean towards mediocrity rather than luxury. I have had these stallwarts and rarely been impressed, and were anyone to take an objective highlighter to the wines they would learn the same. Judgment is subjective, but one thing is certain: every winegrowing region in the world has copied the American methods the last fifteen yearsin order to mimmick the Appearance of color, ripe fruit and lengthier finishes that come with complete ripeness and the newcomers have failed at every turn. Congratulations to the reporter who longs for originality and pursues that agenda thru the conveyance of absolute truth.

  3. As usual I will not ever be surprised that the Americans not only noon they do absolutely nothing except that the war but who can spit on the plate where to eat when we eat yesterday ate their dog with marcusson true?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s